Digital

Products Documentation

Digital Products Documentation for .com Components (internally known as ZeroHeight Documentation Prioritization) was a strategic initiative aimed at standardizing the language and naming conventions for .com components while ensuring clear and consistent documentation for diverse teams, including site ops, marketing, and design. By streamlining and organizing our documentation space, we created consistency across digital products and provided users with essential guidelines and best practices for building components within the .com environment.


My Role

UX Designer

XFN Partners

The Team


1 UX Design Director, 1 UX Designer (me), 1 Project Manager


4 Product Owners, 1 Senior UX Designer, 3 Front-end engineers, 3 Developers


Timeframe

2.5 months


Tools

Figma, Miro, Jira

TL;DR

When Content Flow (CF) launched in Summer 2023, documentation was still aligned with the old CMS (Tridion), making it incompatible and outdated. Limited migration resources led to inconsistencies, forcing users to rely on unofficial workarounds, causing frustration and inefficiencies. To resolve this, we standardized documentation, updated all guidance for key components, introduced clearer governance, and improved accessibility with structured categorization and new resource pages—ensuring long-term usability and scalability for .com content teams.

Outcomes!

✅ All ZH guidance specs updated for landing apps.

✅ ZH guidance specs for PDP/PLP updated and in validation phase.

✅  Video Experience page is live.

✅ Copy written to match user’s language

✅ Foundation of new governance model for ensuring future quality of ZH guidance

✅ New resource pages regarding image specs, component names, etc.

✅ New user-friendly categorization

Context

When Content Flow (CF) launched in Summer 2023, documentation was still tied to the old CMS (Tridion), making it incompatible. Limited migration resources left guidance outdated, forcing users to rely on cheat sheets, leading to frustration and wasted budget. A comprehensive end-to-end approach was urgently needed.

Problem

Inconsistencies across systems and documentation was not up-to-date or built incorrectly for the main audience and user group that uses the platform daily to build marketing content and publish for .com.

PROJECT SCOPING

Inconsistencies Across Platforms

The ability to hack the old CMS system was not possible in the Content Flow. There is less freedom in CF causing upset/confusion/misinterpretations of using different types of specs.

MINDSET & ASSESMENT

Component Harmony Quest

We built a small task force that included 1 project manager, 1 UX designer (me) and 1 UX Director. Every day we mapped out who we would meet to go through a list of components with Product Owners, Developers, UX Designers to bring to light the confusion/misled information.

RESEARCH & DISCOVERY

Gap Analysis

COLLABORATION & IMPLEMENTATION

From Vision to Delivery

REFINE & OPTIMIZE

Validation

LAUNCH & MAINTENANCE

User Satisfaction

The "Glass vs Landing app" is typically used in a design & tech context, whereas the Activation/Planning teams (primary user group) does not use this categorization. Additionally, components are now organized alphabetically, making it simpler to find the desired component.

Previous
Previous

Hoppe Shoppe Website

Next
Next

Renaming Component Priorization